Bilgilendirme

Gönderen: Asil Özdoğru
Tarih: 20 Ocak 2021 14.08
Konu: COVID-19 ile İlgili Duyguları ve Davranışları Araştırma
Alıcı: Katılımcılar

Merhaba,

2020 Haziran ila Ekim aylarında katıldığınız “COVID-19 ile İlgili Duyguları ve Davranışları Araştırma” isimli çalışmamızla ilgili sizleri bilgilendirmek isteriz. Bu çalışma Psikoloji Bilimi Hızlandırıcısı tarafından dünya genelinde gerçekleştirilen çok geniş katılımlı bir araştırmadır. Veri toplama çalışmaları Ekim ayında sona ermiş, veri analiz ve yazım çalışmaları devam etmektedir. Araştırmayla ilgili daha ayrıntılı bilgiyi şuradan edinebilirsiniz: https://psysciacc.org/studies/psacr-1-2-3/

Katılımcı çağrı metninde katılımcılar arasından çekilişle belirlenen 65 talihliye 50 TL değerinde kitap hediye çeki ödül olarak verileceğini belirtmiştik. Çalışmaya katılan ve Ödül Çekiliş Katılım Formunu dolduran katılımcılar arasında ekte göreceğiniz gibi çekiliş yapılarak talihliler belirlenmiştir. Talihli katılımcılara ayrıca e-posta ile ödül bilgileri iletilmiştir.

Araştırmamıza katıldığınız için ve bilimsel çalışmalara destek verdiğiniz için tekrar teşekkür eder, sağlık ve huzur dolu günler dileriz.

Asil Özdoğru
Türkiye PSACR Grubu Adına
https://ozarge.blogspot.com.tr/

Research Article

The COVID-19 International Student Well-being Study

Sarah Van de Velde, Veerle Buffel, Piet Bracke, Guido Van Hal, Nikolett M. Somogyi, Barbara Willems, Edwin Wouters, and for the C19 ISWS Consortium

As a large international consortium of 26 countries and 110 higher-education institutions (HEIs), we successfully developed and executed an online student survey during or directly after the initial peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 International Student Well-being Study (C19 ISWS) is a cross-sectional multicountry study that collected data on higher-education students during the COVID-19 outbreak in the spring of 2020. The dataset allows description of: (1) living conditions, financial conditions, and academic workload before and during the COVID-19 outbreak; (2) the current level of mental well-being and effects on healthy lifestyles; (3) perceived stressors; (4) resources (e.g., social support and economic capital); (5) knowledge related to COVID-19; and (6) attitudes toward COVID-19 measures implemented by the government and relevant HEI. The dataset additionally includes information about COVID-19 measures taken by the government and HEI that were in place during the period of data collection. The collected data provide a comprehensive and comparative dataset on student well-being. In this article, we present the rationale for this study, the development and content of the survey, the methodology of data collection and sampling, and the limitations of the study. In addition, we highlight the opportunities that the dataset provides for advancing social science research on student well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic in varying policy contexts. Thus far, this is, to our knowledge, the first cross-country student well-being survey during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in a unique dataset that enables high-priority socially relevant research.

Keywords: COVID-19, Corona, Higher education, Student well-being, multi-country study

Citation: Van de Velde, S., Buffel, V., Bracke, P., Van Hal, G., Somogyi, N. M., Willems, B., Wouters, E., & for the C19 ISWS Consortium (2021). The COVID-19 International Student Well-being Study. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 49, 114-122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494820981186

Research Article

To Which World Regions Does the Valence–Dominance Model of Social Perception Apply?

Benedict C. Jones, Lisa M. DeBruine, Jessica K. Flake, Marco Tullio Liuzza, Jan Antfolk, Nwadiogo C. Arinze, Izuchukwu L. G. Ndukaihe, Nicholas G. Bloxsom, Savannah C. Lewis, Francesco Foroni, Megan L. Willis, Carmelo P. Cubillas, Miguel A. Vadillo, Enrique Turiegano, Michael Gilead, Almog Simchon, S. Adil Saribay, Nicholas C. Owsley, Chaning Jang, Georgina Mburu, Dustin P. Calvillo, Anna Wlodarczyk, Yue Qi, Kris Ariyabuddhiphongs, Somboon Jarukasemthawee, Harry Manley, Panita Suavansri, Nattasuda Taephant, Ryan M. Stolier, Thomas R. Evans, Judson Bonick, Jan W. Lindemans, Logan F. Ashworth, Amanda C. Hahn, Coralie Chevallier, Aycan Kapucu, Aslan Karaaslan, Juan David Leongómez, Oscar R. Sánchez, Eugenio Valderrama, Milena Vásquez-Amézquita, Nandor Hajdu, Balazs Aczel, Peter Szecsi, Michael Andreychik, Erica D. Musser, Carlota Batres, Chuan-Peng Hu, Qing-Lan Liu, Nicole Legate, Leigh Ann Vaughn, Krystian Barzykowski, Karolina Golik, Irina Schmid, Stefan Stieger, Richard Artner, Chiel Mues, Wolf Vanpaemel, Zhongqing Jiang, Qi Wu, Gabriela M. Marcu, Ian D. Stephen, Jackson G. Lu, Michael C. Philipp, Jack D. Arnal, Eric Hehman, Sally Y. Xie, William J. Chopik, Martin Seehuus, Soufian Azouaghe, Abdelkarim Belhaj, Jamal Elouafa, John P. Wilson, Elliott Kruse, Marietta Papadatou-Pastou, Anabel De La Rosa-Gómez, Alan E. Barba-Sánchez, Isaac González-Santoyo, Tsuyueh Hsu, Chun-Chia Kung, Hsiao-Hsin Wang, Jonathan B. Freeman, Dong Won Oh, Vidar Schei, Therese E. Sverdrup, Carmel A. Levitan, Corey L. Cook, Priyanka Chandel, Pratibha Kujur, Arti Parganiha, Noorshama Parveen, Atanu Kumar Pati, Sraddha Pradhan, Margaret M. Singh, Babita Pande, Jozef Bavolar, Pavol Kačmár, Ilya Zakharov, Sara Álvarez-Solas, Ernest Baskin, Martin Thirkettle, Kathleen Schmidt, Cody D. Christopherson, Trinity Leonis, Jordan W. Suchow, Jonas K. Olofsson, Teodor Jernsäther, Ai-Suan Lee, Jennifer L. Beaudry, Taylor D. Gogan, Julian A. Oldmeadow, Benjamin Balas, Laura M. Stevens, Melissa F. Colloff, Heather D. Flowe, Sami Gülgöz, Mark J. Brandt, Karlijn Hoyer, Bastian Jaeger, Dongning Ren, Willem W. A. Sleegers, Joeri Wissink, Gwenaël Kaminski, Victoria A. Floerke, Heather L. Urry, Sau-Chin Chen, Gerit Pfuhl, Zahir Vally, Dana M. Basnight-Brown, Hans I. Jzerman, Elisa Sarda, Lison Neyroud, Touhami Badidi, Nicolas Van der Linden, Chrystalle B. Y. Tan, Vanja Kovic, Waldir Sampaio, Paulo Ferreira, Diana Santos, Debora I. Burin, Gwendolyn Gardiner, John Protzko, Christoph Schild, Karolina A. Ścigała, Ingo Zettler, Erin M. O’Mara Kunz, Daniel Storage, Fieke M. A. Wagemans, Blair Saunders, Miroslav Sirota, Guyan V. Sloane, Tiago J. S. Lima, Kim Uittenhove, Evie Vergauwe, Katarzyna Jaworska, Julia Stern, Karl Ask, Casper J. J. van Zyl, Anita Körner, Sophia C. Weissgerber, Jordane Boudesseul, Fernando Ruiz-Dodobara, Kay L. Ritchie, Nicholas M. Michalak, Khandis R. Blake, David White, Alasdair R. Gordon-Finlayson, Michele Anne, Steve M. J. Janssen, Kean Mun Lee, Tonje K. Nielsen, Christian K. Tamnes, Janis H. Zickfeld, Anna Dalla Rosa, Michelangelo Vianello, Ferenc Kocsor, Luca Kozma, Ádám Putz, Patrizio Tressoldi, Natalia Irrazabal, Armand Chatard, Samuel Lins, Isabel R. Pinto, Johannes Lutz, Matus Adamkovic, Peter Babincak, Gabriel Baník, Ivan Ropovik, Vinet Coetzee, Barnaby J. W. Dixson, Gianni Ribeiro, Kim Peters, Niklas K. Steffens, Kok Wei Tan, Christopher A. Thorstenson, Ana Maria Fernandez, Rafael M. C. S. Hsu, Jaroslava V. Valentova, Marco A. C. Varella, Nadia S. Corral-Frías, Martha Frías-Armenta, Javad Hatami, Arash Monajem, MohammadHasan Sharifian, Brooke Frohlich, Hause Lin, Michael Inzlicht, Ravin Alaei, Nicholas O. Rule, Claus Lamm, Ekaterina Pronizius, Martin Voracek, Jerome Olsen, Erik Mac Giolla, Aysegul Akgoz, Asil A. Özdoğru, Matthew T. Crawford, Brooke Bennett-Day, Monica A. Koehn, Ceylan Okan, Tripat Gill, Jeremy K. Miller, Yarrow Dunham, Xin Yang, Sinan Alper, Martha Lucia Borras-Guevara, Sun Jun Cai, Dong Tiantian, Alexander F. Danvers, David R. Feinberg, Marie M. Armstrong, Eva Gilboa-Schechtman, Randy J. McCarthy, Jose Antonio Muñoz-Reyes, Pablo Polo, Victor K. M. Shiramazu, Wen-Jing Yan, Lilian Carvalho, Patrick S. Forscher, Christopher R. Chartier, and Nicholas A. Coles

Over the past 10 years, Oosterhof and Todorov’s valence–dominance model has emerged as the most prominent account of how people evaluate faces on social dimensions. In this model, two dimensions (valence and dominance) underpin social judgements of faces. Because this model has primarily been developed and tested in Western regions, it is unclear whether these findings apply to other regions. We addressed this question by replicating Oosterhof and Todorov’s methodology across 11 world regions, 41 countries and 11,570 participants. When we used Oosterhof and Todorov’s original analysis strategy, the valence–dominance model generalized across regions. When we used an alternative methodology to allow for correlated dimensions, we observed much less generalization. Collectively, these results suggest that, while the valence–dominance model generalizes very well across regions when dimensions are forced to be orthogonal, regional differences are revealed when we use different extraction methods and correlate and rotate the dimension reduction solution.

Citation: Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Flake, J. K., Liuzza, M. T., Antfolk, J., Arinze, N. C., Ndukaihe, I. L. G., Bloxsom, N. G., Lewis, S. C., Foroni, F., Willis, M. L., Cubillas, C. P., Vadillo, M. A., Turiegano, E., Gilead, M., Simchon, A., Saribay, S. A., Owsley, N. C., Jang, C., . . . Coles, N. A. (2021). To which world regions does the valence–dominance model of social perception apply? Nature Human Behavior, 5, 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01007-2